|
On-line Forums
'General' Measurements
On-Wafer S- and Noise-Parameters Measurements
Signal Integrity and Multiport Measurements
Nonlinear and Loadpull Measurements
Coaxial VNA Measurements
Errors and Uncertainties for VNA Measurements
|
Nonlinear and Loadpull
Measurements Forum
Top |
Moderator |
FAQ |
Bibliography
Yahoo! MTT-11 Nonlinear Measurements Newsgroup addresses questions related to measurements of nonlinear devices and circuits (both on-wafer and coaxial), measurement-based modeling, and measurements for wireless systems.
How It Works
To join this forum, simply insert
your e-mail above, and then click on the "Join Now" button, and then follow the instructions for signing up to be a member of Yahoo! Groups. The only requirement to join this newsgroup is membership in IEEE.
In order to expedite your subscription, please do one of the following: (1) Send the moderator your IEEE number, or (2) Send the moderator your name if you are an MTT-S member.
Warning: Do not register using an "ieee.org" alias. The IEEE server filters Yahoo! emails.
Once you've been approved you can ask the moderator, who is an expert in this field (see the section below), a question. He
or she will then either answer your question, send you to an existing thread that has previously answered your question, or ask somebody else to respond. You can also respond to a previous message or browse through the archives by clicking on the link at the top of the page.
Once you've joined this forum, feel free to ask a question
to the moderator, or respond to a previous message by sending an email to:
mtt-11-nonlinear@yahoogroups.com.
Top | Moderator |
FAQ |
Bibliography
Moderator
Dominique M. M.-P. Schreurs (S'90-M'97) received the M.Sc. degree in electronic engineering and the Ph.D. degree from the Katholieke Universiteit (K.U.)Leuven, Belgium, in 1992 and 1997, respectively. She is currently a post-doctoral fellow of the fund for scientific research-Flanders and a visiting assistant professor at K.U.Leuven. She has been a visiting scientist at Agilent Technologies, ETHZ in Switzerland, and NIST. Her main research interest is the use of vectorial large-signal measurements for the characterization and modelling of non-linear microwave devices. You can contact Dominique directly at Dominique.Schreurs@esat.kuleuven.ac.be.
Kate A. Remley received the Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Oregon State University in 1999. She worked as a broadcast engineer in Eugene, OR between 1983 and 1992. She joined the Radio-Frequency Technology Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in 1999 where she develops metrology for characterization of nonlinear devices used in wireless communication systems. You can contact Kate directly at remley@boulder.nist.gov.
Top | Moderator |
FAQ |
Bibliography
Frequently Asked Questions
Large-Signal Measurements
Q. I would
really like to find more information on Large Signal measurements,
specifically how they are done and the hardware needed to setup the
measurement. Could anyone point me towards some good resources to start my
learning process on this issue?
A. A good
place to start with nonlinear and large-signal measurements might be
Steve Kenney's chapter on Nonlinear Measurements in the RF and Microwave
Handbook, Mike Golio editor. That has a good introduction into nonlinear
processes and how to make the basic measurements.
The chapter does not
deal extensively with the issue of phase measurements. If you are
interested in that, you might want to find out more about (1) vector
signal analyzers, (2) large-signal network analyzers, and (3)
oscilloscope methods:
(1) Vector signal
analyzers are discussed briefly in the Microwave and RF Handbook chapter,
plus most manufacturers have good info on their web sites.
(2) Wendy Van Moer and
Yves Rolain had a recent article describing in depth one type of
large-signal network analyzer in the December 2006 issue of IEEE
Microwave Magazine. The reference is: W. Van Moer, Y. Rolain, "A large-signal network analyzer: Why is it needed?" IEEE Microwave
Magazine, vol. 7, no. 6, Dec. 2006, pp. 46 - 62.
You can also go to the
web site for the one commercial product that is available and look at
the literature there, too. Plus you can go to the seminal work in this
area by looking at these references: [1] T. Van den Broeck and J.
Verspecht, "Calibrated vectorial nonlinear network analyzer," in Proc.
IEEE MTT-S, San-Diego, CA, 1994, pp. 1069-1072. [2] Urs Lott,
"Measurement of magnitude and phase of harmonics generated in nonlinear
microwave two-ports," IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 37, no.
10, pp. 1506-1511, Oct. 1989. [3] G. Kompa and F. van Raay,
"Error-corrected large-signal waveform measurement system combining
network analyser and sampling oscilloscope capabilities," IEEE Trans.
Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 358-365, Apr. 1990. [4] M.
Demmler, P.J. Tasker, and M. Schlechtweg, "A vector corrected high power
on-wafer measurement system with a frequency range for the higher
harmonics up to 40 GHz," in Proc. European Microwave Conf., 1994, pp.
1367-1372.
A new type of large
signal network analyzer was recently proposed in "Mixer-based,
vector-corrected, vector signal/network analyzer offering 300kHz-20GHz
bandwidth and traceable phase response Blockley, P.; Gunyan, D.; Scott,
J.B.; Microwave Symposium Digest, 2005 IEEE MTT-S International 12-17
June 2005." This is an exciting proof of concept.
(3) Finally, work on
using oscilloscopes for broadband nonlinear measurements was discussed
in
[1] P. D. Hale, C. M.
Wang, D. F. Williams, K. A. Remley, and J. Wepman, "Compensation of
random and systematic timing errors in sampling oscilloscopes," IEEE
Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 55, no. 6. pp. 2146-2154, Dec. 2006.
[2] K.A. Remley, P.D. Hale, D.I. Bergman, D. Keenan, "Comparison of
multisine measurements from instrumentation capable of nonlinear system
characterization,” 66th ARFTG Conf. Dig., Dec. 2005, pp. 34-43
[3] D.F. Williams, T.S. Clement, P.D. Hale, and A. Dienstfrey, "Terminology
for high-speed sampling-oscilloscope calibration," ARFTG Conf. Dig.,
Dec. 2006. (ARFTG best paper award)
Multisines
Q: I have been
trying to simulate a Schroeder multisine using for quite a while but with
little progress. My code generates a multisine as follows:
X = sum (Ak cos(2*pi*(fc +
k*del_f)*t + schroeder phase))
From the magnitude spectrum,
I can get a flat spectrum only if my del_f is a multiple of fc. That means
if I want to simulate an fc of 1GHz, I would need del_f to be minimum of 1
GHz or multiples of 1GHz. That would make my bandwidth extremely large. If I
use a smaller del_f, I will not get a flat spectrum. What is the problem?
How do I simulate at a higher carrier frequency with a small bandwidth?
Could you provide any advice for me to tackle multisine designs?
A: If you
are not getting a flat amplitude spectrum for a Schroeder multisine
except when the tone spacing is equal to harmonics of the carrier
frequency, my guess is that you do are not taking the correct number of
samples in the time domain signal, and so the FFT has spectral leakage.
You will need to find a sampling time that gives you an integer number
of RF cycles of the carrier frequency and, more importantly, an integer
number of envelope cycles. My guess is that the latter is the problem.
The period of the
envelope is 1/delta_f, so for example, if your tone spacing is 1 MHz,
the envelope period will be 1/delta_f = 1 microsecond. You will need to
carry out the simulation for n * 1 microsecond exactly, and you need to
make sure the sampling time you choose will enable this, that is, the
sampling time should be a fraction of 1 microsecond. So it is necessary
to carefully select both the sampling time and the maximum time in your
time vector. Information on aspects of multisine test signals such as
number of tones, phase relationships, and repeat measurements can be
found in
K.A. Remley, "Multisine
excitation for ACPR measurements," IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig.,
June 2003, pp. 2141-2144.
Phase Calibrations
Q: I have seen
a number of references, which suggest using a comb generator for wideband
phase calibration. But I have not seen any references, which indicate just
how accurate the phase reference is from a comb generator over say 100 MHz
to 10 GHz. Since a typical comb generator output shows variations in
amplitude over this frequency range, I presume that there must be phase
variations. Can anyone direct me to any published information, which shows
the quantitative variation in comb phase versus frequency over this
frequency range?
A: The
topic of phase calibration using comb generators has been a subject of a
great deal of research in the last few years. Even though the magnitude
and phase of a comb-generator signal may vary over the frequencies of
interest, as long as we can measure those variations externally, we can
correct the measurements and use the comb generator as a reference
source.
The "nose-to-nose"
procedure is often used to calibrate a sampling oscilloscope that is
then used to characterize a comb generator. There are several references
on this method on the MTT-11 Nonlinear Forum website www.mtt.org/measurements/nmf
(see "Nose-to-Nose Phase Calibration" a well as "Other Phase
Calibrations").
Additional work on this
topic is from a workshop at the 60th ARFTG conference (Fall 2002). The
workshop presentation was "Comb-Generator Characterization with
Calibrated Oscilloscopes." It was written by Dylan Williams, Tracy
Clement, Paul Hale, and Juanita Morgan (NIST), as well as Howard Reader
(Univ. of Stellenbosch, South Africa), and Steve Vandenplas, Jan
Verspecht, Frans Verbeyst, Varc Vanden Bossche (NMDG Engineering).
The presentation talks
about using an electro-optic sampling (EOS) system to characterize an
optical photodetector, which is then used to calibrate a sampling
oscilloscope. The scope provides a calibrated measurement of a comb
generator in both magnitude and phase. A preliminary uncertainty
analysis of the photodetector measurements by EOS system has been
carried out to 110 GHz. It shows uncertainty of less than 2 degrees in
phase at 10 GHz (less than 4.5 degrees in phase at 50 GHz).
Measurements of a comb
generator made with the EOS-calibrated and nose-to-nose calibrated
oscilloscopes are compared in this work and agree to within about 2
degrees to almost 20 GHz. This work will hopefully be published in a
conference or journal paper soon - it is under way at this moment.
What does the above
discussion mean for the practicing engineer? If you are only looking at
frequencies below 20 GHz, the nose-to-nose calibration appears to be
adequate. If you don't have that capability, you could probably send
your scope somewhere to be calibrated. With a calibrated scope, you can
more or less characterize the comb generator yourself (you will still
have issues with time-base distortion and mismatch correction, but those
are discussed in the references). If you want to go above 20 GHz, you
might want to investigate a transfer standard based on an EOS-calibrated
photodiode.
Figures of Merit for Nonlinear
Systems
Q: I assume
that IP3, P1dB, AM/AM as well as AM/PM response will help predicting the NPR.
Can you recommend software that can calculate and predict NPR?
A: As far
as I know, there is no commercial software specifically intended for NPR
predictions. Nevertheless, there are some ways (although none of them is
easy) you could estimate that distortion figure:
1 – Use a
harmonic-balance nonlinear circuit simulator with an excitation composed
of many tones equally separated in frequency with one or more in the
middle shutdown (those frequency positions will constitute the test
frequencies). If the tones are equally separated, the stimulus can be
viewed as being dependent on only two base frequencies (the central
frequency, or carrier frequency, and the common separation) which eases
the computations. Nevertheless, when the number of tones increases, the
number of harmonics of the separation may be so high that the problem
can easily become intractable. In this view, a NPR computation relies on
averaging the results obtained in various simulation runs by randomly
varying the phases of each tone. This way you will be simulating not a
deterministic spectrum, but a band-limited power spectral density
function corresponding to Gaussian distributed noise.
2 – Use an envelope
driven harmonic-balance simulator with an excitation composed of a
carrier modulated by Gaussian distributed noise. More precisely, the
modulation should be of the I/Q type in which both the I and the Q
modulation signals are independent Gaussian distributed band-limited
white noise. Then, before using this signal in the circuit, you will
have to create a notch in the input spectrum. It will be this notch that
corresponds to the desired measurement window.
Both of these methods
require the complete knowledge of the equivalent circuit of the
amplifier and a detailed nonlinear model of its active device. If such
models are not available, then you will have to rely on a behavioural
characterization of the amplifier. References like:
[1] - J. C. Pedro and
N. B. Carvalho, "On the Use of Multi-Tone Techniques for Assessing RF
Components’ Intermodulation Distortion”, IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory
and Techniques, vol. MTT-47, nº 12, pp.2393-2402, Dec. 1999.
[2] - N. B. Carvalho
and J. C. Pedro, "Compact Formulas to Relate ACPR and NPR to Two-Tone
IMR and IP3", Microwave Journal, vol. 42, No.12, pp.70,77-78,80,82,84,
Dec. 1999.
[3] - J. C. Pedro e N.
B. Carvalho, Intermodulation Distortion in Microwave and Wireless
Circuits, Artech House, Inc., Norwood, MA., 2003
have shown that, for
memoryless and mild nonlinearities described by 3rd order Taylor series,
it is possible to relate NPR with IP3 or IMR. Since your circuit is a
class A amplifier it should be considered a mild nonlinearity. Therefore,
even if it can not be considered memoryless, you may still get some
rough estimates of NPR performance.
Q: I’m
searching for the mathematical relationships between AM/AM, AM/PM, IP3 and
ACPR for a multisine.
A: Some of
the answers to your question appear in a paper by members of our
discussion forum. The reference is:
"On the use of
multitone techniques for assessing RF components' intermodulation
distortion," J.C. Pedro and N. B. de Carvalho, MTT Transactions, Dec.
1999, pp. 2392-2402.
In this paper, they
analytically compare multisine approximations of several digital figures
of merit, including intermodulation ratio and ACPR. The multisines in
their paper have random phase relationships between the frequency
components. You could also take a look at the companion paper:
"Compact forumulas to
relate ACPR and NPR to two-tone IMR and IP3," N. B. de Carvalho and J.C.
Pedro, Microwave Journal, Dec. 1999, pp. 70-84.
As well, the MTT-11
Nonlinear Forum ( http://mtt.org/committees/mtt-11/index.html, click on
"Nonlinear Forum") has a bibliographic section with several references
that address this issue in one way or another. You might want to look
under the section 1(d): System characterization using special test
signals
Mixer Reciprocity
Q: I was
wondering whether anyone in this discussion group has had experience using a
mixer as a reciprocal device at frequencies of 1-20 GHz. Many papers refer
to using a reciprocal mixer for calibrating a vector network analyzer when
the VNA is used for frequency-offset measurements. These papers assume that
a mixer, when operated in the linear region, and is well matched at all
ports, is reciprocal.
Would anyone like to
comment on the reciprocity error in mixers? I would be particularly
interested in any quantitative measurements of both amplitude and phase
reciprocity. If mixers are not reciprocal, do you think it is reasonable to
believe that mixer reciprocity error is constant and they could still be
used for frequency-offset calibration using a one-time-determined
reciprocity coefficient?
A: When
two identical mixers are used, we expect their nonreciprocal behavior to
be approximately the same. Thus it doesn't really matter which is used
as upconverter and which is used as downconverter, the pair together
will exhibit approximately reciprocal behavior. However, when two
different mixers are used, the difference between upconversion and
downconversion of each mixer becomes apparent.
What is really needed
is a way to measure the behavior of an individual mixer. This is hard
with a VNA, since the same frequencies should appear on both ports. In
fact, this topic is the subject of current research at several
institutions. To measure the magnitude reciprocity, Joel Dunsmore et al.
mention a method in [1] that uses a power-meter calibrated VNA. Offhand,
I did not find a reference that explains this method in detail, but
there may be an Application Note describing it.
There are currently two
methods that I am aware of being developed to characterize both
magnitude and phase reciprocity of an individual mixer. The first method
is based on the Large-Signal Network Analyzer [2, 3], which can measure
the magnitude and phase of signals at harmonically related frequencies.
The second method [4], developed at NIST, is based on use of a
calibrated oscilloscope. Because the scope can sample several channels
simultaneously, one can acquire and align signals at both the IF and RF
frequencies.
[1] J. Dunsmore, "Novel
method for vector mixer characterization and mixer test system vector
error correction," IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., June 2002, pp.
1833-1836.
[2] W. Van Moer and Y.
Rolain, "Determining the reciprocity of mixers through 3-port
large-signal network analyzer measurements," 62nd ARFTG Conf. Dig., Dec.
2003, pp. 165-170."
[3] A. Cidronali, K.C.
Gupta, J.A. Jargon, K.A. Remley, D.C. DeGroot, G. Manes, "Extraction of
conversion matrices for P-HEMTs based on vectorial large-signal
measurements," IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig., June 2003, pp.
777-780.
[4] D. F. Williams, H.
Khenissi, F. Ndagijimana, K. A. Remley, J. P. Dunsmore, P. D. Hale, C.
M. Wang, and T. S. Clement, "Sampling-Oscilloscope Measurement of a
Microwave Mixer with Single-Digit Phase Accuracy," IEEE Trans. Microwave
Theory Tech. vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 1210-1217, March 2006.
Load-Pull Measurements
Q: For load
pull measurement (on wafer devices), do we get the power contour at constant
delivered input power or constant absorbed input power. I always find that
paper only use Pin without specification.
A: Use
constant available power, i.e., constant a1 for perfect source
termination.
Q: Another
thing is how to choose the input power level for finding optimal load?
A: One
hopes the sensitivity of optimum termination to drive level is low; it
should be zero for small signals, but a power amplifier mostly comes
into its own... where? This varies with your application. The first
onset of hard nonlinearity is not a bad place to look, and P-1dB is a
good RF measure of this place.
If the sensitivity were
to be high, and your target signal a complex-modulated carrier with high
crest factor, I would optimize in the small-signal region by backing off
(by the crest factor?). I have not heard of this being done.
I too have noted that
papers are not usually clear on these points.
Top | Moderator |
FAQ |
Bibliography
Selected Bibliography
Disclaimer: This is not an exhaustive bibliography. If you would like to suggest a suitable paper to be listed here, please email the moderator.
1. Measurements of digitally modulated signals
2. Load pull and high-power measurements
3. NVNA measurements (including LSNA, MTA, and scope measurements)
4. Measurement-based behavioral modeling
5. Measurement of long-memory effects
6. Measurements of frequency converters
7. Differential measurements of NL devices
1. Measurements of digitally modulated signals
a. Distortion measurements (ACPR, NPR, etc.)
b. Power measurements
c. BER and other system measurements
d. System characterization using special test signals
Measurements Relating Two-Tone and Digital Modulation Figures of Merit
An examination of
two measures of power amplifier linearity - intermodulation distortion
and channel spectral regrowth
J. Staudinger
Proc. Wireless Comm. Conf.
1996 Page(s):27 - 30 |
[Baseband-equivalent models of a CDMA system for a bandpass nonlinearity derived from AM/AM and AM/PM. The derived model is used to predict two-tone intermodulation and NPR.]
ACPR, IM3 and their
correlation for a PCS CDMA power amplifier
W. Xinwei, H. Nakamura, and R. Singhn
50th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 50, 1997 Page(s):91 - 96
|
 |
|
Full Text: PDF |
[Measured and simulated results showing correlation between IM3 and ACPR in a weakly nonlinear power amplifier.]
[Two-tone measurements are used to find AM/AM and AM/PM, linked to an analytical, baseband-equivalent model of a memoryless amplifier. Results are used to bound the expected ACPR. The method is demonstrated on one example.]
[Extraction of an intrinsic kernel function from two-tone measurements, and subsequent calculation of EVM. The intrinsic kernel function of an RF amplifier represents the incremental change in distortion characteristics of the power amplifier for incremental changes in signal amplitude.]
[A dynamic two-tone measurement set-up is described to find both AM/AM and AM/PM].
Multisines to Approximate Digital Modulation
[Summarizes some early work on multisines with low peak-to-average-power characteristics.]
See also:
Characterization of
a 2 GHz submicron bipolar 60 watt power transistor with single tone,
multi-tone, and CDMA signals
M. Shaw and A. Wood
47th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 47, 1996 Page(s):26 - 31
|
 |
|
Full Text: PDF |
[Loadpull set-up using a multisine source for excitation and an MTA as a vector receiver.]
Measuring the
characteristics of modulated non-linear devices
Y. Rolain, W. van Moer, and P. Vael
53th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 53, 1999 Page(s):89 - 97
|
 |
|
Full Text: PDF |
[Characterization of an RFIC using NVNA. Measurements of wave variables, frequency-dependent behavior of the amplifier, and spectral regrowth at harmonics with swept power. Description of hardware and software used.]
[Develops and compares closed-form solutions for common nonlinear system figures of merit (IMD, NPR, ACPR, CCPR) using multisine excitation. Investigates number of tones required.]
[Extracts model parameters from single-tone input signals and validates the model with multisine measurements of spectral regrowth.]
Network analysis
beyond S-parameters: characterizing and modeling component behaviour
under modulated large-signal conditions
J. Verspecht, F. Verbeyst, and M. Vanden Bossche
56th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 56, Dec. 2000 Page(s):9 - 12
|
 |
|
Full Text: PDF |
[Measurements of amplifier utilizing NVNA and multisine excitation. Effects of harmonic generation on distortion illustrated in the time domain.]
System
Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach
R. Pintelon and J. Schoukens
New York, NY: IEEE Press, 2001. |
[Sections of the book discuss the appropriate use of multisines.]
[Use of multisines to verify explanation of distortion asymmetry.]
[Investigates the use of four types of multisines in the approximation of digital modulation for ACPR measurements.]
Accurate Measurement
of Wideband Modulated Signals
A. A. Moulthrop, M. S. Muha, and C. P. Silva
Microwave Journal
Volume 43, Issue 6, Jun. 2000 Page(s):84 - 98
|
(see also topics
2, 3,
4, and 5)
2. Load Pull and High-Power Measurements
a. Passive load pull
b. Active load pull
c. NVNA and load pull
d. Other high power measurements
(see also topics 4 and
7)
3. NVNA Measurements (including LSNA, MTA, and scope measurements)
a. Evolution of NVNA measurements
[2-channel scope with one coupler at the input.]
[Phase reference calibration using a "golden diode" approach.]
[2-channel scope with VNA test-set + receiver.]
A Vector Corrected
High Power On-Wafer Measurement System with a Frequency Range for the
Higher Harmonics up to 40 GHz
M. Demmler, P. Tasker, and M. Schlechtweg
Proc. 24th European Microwave Conference
Volume 24, 1994 Page(s):1367 - 1372
|
[Test-set with MTA.]
[Test-set with MTA.]
[4 couplers with 2 synchronised MTA's.]
Measurements of time-domain voltage/current waveforms at RF and
microwave frequencies based on the use of a vector network
analyzer for the characterization of nonlinear
devices-application to high-efficiency power amplifiers and
frequency-multipliers optimization
Barataud, D.; Arnaud, C.; Thibaud, B.; Campovecchio, M.; Nebus,
J.-M.; Villotte, J.P.;
Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on
Volume 47, Issue 5, Oct. 1998 Page(s):1259 - 1264
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/19.746594
|
 |
|
AbstractPlus |
References | Full Text:
PDF(236 KB)
Rights and Permissions |
[VNA test-set + receiver with loadpull and pulsed capability.]
b. Calibration of NVNAs
General NVNA Calibration
[Description of early NVNA hardware and calibration.]
[Evolved description of NVNA and calibrations.]
[A method for calibrating NVNA's for modulated signal measurements.]
Calibration of a
wideband IF nonlinear vectorial network analyser
W. Van Moer and Y. Rolain
53th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 53, 1999 Page(s):98 - 103
|
 |
|
Full Text: PDF |
[Description of stochastically based calibration and comparison to standard calibration.]
[De-embedding of vector quantities and power at the probe tips for on-wafer measurements.]
Nose-to-Nose Phase Calibration
[First paper demonstrating similarity of kickout pulse and impulse response of samplers.]
[Theoretical model of nose-to-nose calibration, measurements comparing swept-sine and nose-to-nose, preliminary error analysis.]
[Analytic model of nose-to-nose calibration with diode represented as time-varying conductance. Effects of sampling circuit asymmetry. Measurements investigating error mechanisms: sampler linearity, repeatability and noise, timebase drift and jitter, diode conductance symmetry.]
Estimating the
magnitude and phase response of a 50 GHz sampling oscilloscope using the
'Nose-to-Nose' method
P. D. Hale, T. S. Clement, K. J. Coakley, C. M. Wang, D. C. DeGroot, and
A. P. Verdoni
55th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 55, 2000 Page(s):35 - 42
|
 |
|
Full Text: PDF |
[Discussion of measurement method and potential measurement errors including time-base drift, distortion, and mismatch. Measurement results.]
Analysis of
interconnection networks and mismatch in the nose-to-nose calibration
D. C. DeGroot, P. D. Hale, M. Vanden Bossche, F. Verbeyst, and J.
Verspecht
55th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 55, 2000 Page(s):116 - 121
|
 |
|
Full Text: PDF |
[Analysis of conditions on input network for nose-to-nose calibration validity.]
[SPICE model simulations showing the change in the shape of the kickout pulse due to the sampling diodeís nonlinear junction capacitance.]
[Analytic model including cases with constant diode junction capacitance, asymmetric diode conductance, and nonlinear diode junction capacitance.]
Other Phase Calibrations
[Comparison of Schottky diodes, step-recovery diodes, and nonlinear transmission lines as possible on-wafer phase reference generators.]
[Derives an upper bound on phase error of samplers.]
(see also topics
4, 5,
6, 7, and 8)
4. Measurement-Based Behavioral Modeling
a. Devices
b. Circuits, subsystems, and systems
(see also topics 1,
2 and 5)
5. Measurement of long-memory effects
Two-tone measurements:
Measurement of
memory effect of high-power Si LDMOSFET amplifier using two-tone phase
evaluation
B. Kim, Y. Yang, J. Cha, Y. Y. Woo, and J. Yi
60th ARFTG Conference Digest
Volume 60, Dec. 2002
|
[Detailed description of measurement set-up and methodology for finding relative phases through cancellation of intermodulation products of amplifiers excited with two-tone signals.]
See also original short paper:
[Introduction to the above measurement set-up.]
The original work in this area was described in:
[Original work on measurement of relative phase through cancellation of IM products of amplifiers excited with two-tone signals.]
[Measure magnitude and phase of a two-tone excitation as a function of input power and frequency spacing using two VNAs. A pulsed system to capture long thermal memory effects is also demonstrated.]
[Method to use a simple
(two-tone) signal for development of a model that includes memory effects.
Model validation using CDMA IS-95 signal on low- and high-power amplifiers.]
Three-tone measurements:
[A three-tone method to find the phase of two-tone excitation intermodulation products. The third tone is set for frequency of the intermod product of interest. Its magnitude and phase are adjusted for best cancellation. The paper also has a thorough description of the causes of long-memory effects.]
Pulse measurements:
[A measurement technique that downconverts a microwave signal to its low-pass equivalent form using a calibrated downconverter. The measurement system utilizes pulsed excitation and an MTA.]
(see also topics 2 and
4)
6. Measurements of frequency converters
7. Differential measurements of NL devices
|